While the 1989 adaptation of the Marvel comic was a cheesy, action-packed, B-movie starring Dolph Lundgren, the 2004 is a big-bucks Hollywood blockbuster which stands as a great example of its kind. Reviewed by Leofwine_draca 9 / 10 Dark, brooding, violent action.top stuff, in other words The Producers didn't even bother to have Him wear the Trademark skull logo. An Ultra-Low Budget Affair that didn't have a clue. Note 2.The First Appearance of The Punisher in Film was done in (1989) starring Dolph Lundgren. Note.If you liked this there is a follow up Movie, Punisher War Zone (2008) that is even More Violent and is an Over the Top Treat for Frank Castle Fans. There are Other Outstanding Scenes like the Hard-Nosed Fight with the Russian, and the Ending as The Punisher is just Nasty and Brutal in a Movie that is Brutal from the Beginning.įans of the Comic will Most Likely Like it as will Action Movie Junkies that Appreciate R-Rated Comic Book Movies that Don't Hold Back. This and a Few Other Satiric Highlights do Lighten the Film just a Bit, Like the Hired Killer from Memphis. The Film may be a Tad Too Long with John Travolta's Villainous Character and Assorted Sub-Plots, but it doesn't Manage to Detract from the Power of the Revenge Story and the Part with the Neighbors, Highlighted by Ben Foster's Gen-X Slacker. In this Movie Thomas Jane Manages to Brood with Believability and is Stone-Faced Serious, just Like His Comic-Book Persona. The Punisher Became a Relentless Vigilante with Little Remorse and Used Stylized Ultra-Violence as His MO. Underrated, Violent, and Grim, this R-Rated Marvel Comics Movie is Fairly Accurate in Tone to the Comic Books that have been Around Since 1974 when the Character Debuted in the Amazing Spider-Man Book. Reviewed by LeonLouisRicci 9 / 10 Only The Punisher CAN Bring a Knife to a Gun Fight
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |